Discussing banning Artif. Intell. research for autonomous killer robots: Too far away and DoD too risk-averse to try http://huff.to/1JXjycF
-
-
.
@ChristophAdami First of all the call is for a ban on#AutonomousWeapons, which is equivalent to mandatory human control and decision.1 retweet 0 likes -
.
@ChristophAdami This does not have any implications against#AI research and should not be "disruptive" of it in any way.#KillerRobots0 retweets 0 likes -
.
@ChristophAdami You argue from a single anecdote that#AutonomousWeapons won't be used because not understood and folks are "risk averse."0 retweets 0 likes -
.
@ChristophAdami In wars and arms races people take risks they otherwise would not.#KillerRobots are happening today. Not hypothetical.0 retweets 0 likes
.@ChristophAdami If you think #AutonomousWeapons won't happen cuz too scary and dangerous, how do you explain #NuclearWeapons? #KillerRobots
-
-
.
@mgubrud#NuclearWeapons have human in loop. What's scaring NASA & DoD about#KillerRobots is lack of control. Human control neq autonomy0 retweets 0 likes -
.
@ChristophAdami If you think#KillerRobots won't be used anyway, why not formalize that with a ban (requiring human control & decision)?0 retweets 0 likes -
.
@mgubrud It's like banning space elevators. Tech does not exist, & won't for long time. War theatre orders more complex than car driving.0 retweets 0 likes -
.
@ChristophAdami Many countries already fielding#AutonomousWeapons that hunt, identify & attack targets autonomously. More in pipeline.0 retweets 0 likes
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.